We wouldn’t put too much weight in that, though, as the RAV4 is still a Top Safety Pick … it just doesn’t get the +.īoth come standard with forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking, lane-keep assist, and adaptive cruise control, while blind-spot and rear-cross traffic are standard on all but the base RAV4 LE (a trim that had no equal in the CR-V lineup at the time of this writing). The RAV4 hasn’t even been subjected to that test yet, and it received “Average” scores in two of the IIHS updated tests where the CR-V aced. The CR-V received a Top Safety Pick+ award from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety for its best-possible performance in all categories, except for one new category: it got two out of three points for front crash prevention at night. Finally, certain RAV4 models like the Adventure, Woodland and TRD Off-Road have more functional roof rails than the CR-V’s. The RAV4 Hybrid also has a spare tire, while the CR-V Hybrid does not. Its cargo cover can be stored under the floor, which itself can lower by about 2 inches for increased space/versatility.
It has greater advantages than that, though. We backed this up in real-world testing, too, as the Toyota can in fact hold just a bit more behind its raised back seat. On paper, the RAV4 has more cargo space with 37.5 cubic-feet to the CR-V’s 36.3. (CR-V is the one with leather upholstery and no rubber cargo mat) Which has more cargo capacity and functionality?
0 kommentar(er)
